<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working hard, or hardly working?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myotherpants.com/2010/02/working-hard-or-hardly-working/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://myotherpants.com/2010/02/working-hard-or-hardly-working/</link>
	<description>I left it in my other pants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonasbn</title>
		<link>http://myotherpants.com/2010/02/working-hard-or-hardly-working/comment-page-1/#comment-5985</link>
		<dc:creator>jonasbn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myotherpants.com/?p=200#comment-5985</guid>
		<description>Nice article - I am however a bit confused on exactly where you want to go with what you describe. At one point you encourage change and experimentation at another you point fingers at burning down and starting over.

I really enjoyed the article and it made me put a my practices at my day job into perspective - but I think you squeezed in too many aspects of organization, self-development and practices in one single article - or perhaps it is just me, who cannot follow you.

Keep up the good work,

jonasbn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article &#8211; I am however a bit confused on exactly where you want to go with what you describe. At one point you encourage change and experimentation at another you point fingers at burning down and starting over.</p>
<p>I really enjoyed the article and it made me put a my practices at my day job into perspective &#8211; but I think you squeezed in too many aspects of organization, self-development and practices in one single article &#8211; or perhaps it is just me, who cannot follow you.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work,</p>
<p>jonasbn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt A</title>
		<link>http://myotherpants.com/2010/02/working-hard-or-hardly-working/comment-page-1/#comment-2390</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myotherpants.com/?p=200#comment-2390</guid>
		<description>As soon as you said &quot;mad scientist&quot;, I&#039;m reminded of the Spolsky tidbit in his Duct Tape programmer post:  &quot;...what would otherwise be a perfectly good programming technique FOR SPOCK.&quot;  Spock, Rainman, Mad Scientists... not evil, just misunderstood.  :)

I really relate to your perl comment.  I&#039;d forgotten all about my perl &quot;transgressions&quot; until you mention it.  And... uh... Huh.  My sudden resentment over the indignance of my C# contemporaries with regard to Perl has temporarily neutralized my already limited ability to make further constructive comments.  Dammit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as you said &#8220;mad scientist&#8221;, I&#8217;m reminded of the Spolsky tidbit in his Duct Tape programmer post:  &#8220;&#8230;what would otherwise be a perfectly good programming technique FOR SPOCK.&#8221;  Spock, Rainman, Mad Scientists&#8230; not evil, just misunderstood.  <img src='http://myotherpants.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I really relate to your perl comment.  I&#8217;d forgotten all about my perl &#8220;transgressions&#8221; until you mention it.  And&#8230; uh&#8230; Huh.  My sudden resentment over the indignance of my C# contemporaries with regard to Perl has temporarily neutralized my already limited ability to make further constructive comments.  Dammit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ball</title>
		<link>http://myotherpants.com/2010/02/working-hard-or-hardly-working/comment-page-1/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myotherpants.com/?p=200#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to chew on this, and maybe ask around an post again.  I don&#039;t have a firm understanding of how to handle the mad-scientist, the kind who develops a DSL to replace your test environment one night, because I&#039;m either him or standing on the sidelines yelling, &quot;That is SOOO sweet!&quot;  While I&#039;m learning more and more the importance of leaving maintainable (by people who don&#039;t find it &quot;fun&quot; to learn the nooks and crannies of Perl for example.  I&#039;m oh, so sorry for my crimes.  Mostly.) code, The team should try to find that line between &quot;dark-magic,&quot; &quot;Encapsulated but hard,&quot; and &quot;pattern&quot; together.

There will probably be dark corners of any interesting application, but they should be placed there on purpose and successfully encapsulated from the rest of the app.  Why would they exist? Performance optimizations (the crazy SQL statements come to mind) or to make the rest of the app easier to develop (app specific frameworks).  If you do identify a need to get magical, you need to re-think it, then test the crap out of it.  Asking for a white paper on the topic wouldn&#039;t hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to chew on this, and maybe ask around an post again.  I don&#8217;t have a firm understanding of how to handle the mad-scientist, the kind who develops a DSL to replace your test environment one night, because I&#8217;m either him or standing on the sidelines yelling, &#8220;That is SOOO sweet!&#8221;  While I&#8217;m learning more and more the importance of leaving maintainable (by people who don&#8217;t find it &#8220;fun&#8221; to learn the nooks and crannies of Perl for example.  I&#8217;m oh, so sorry for my crimes.  Mostly.) code, The team should try to find that line between &#8220;dark-magic,&#8221; &#8220;Encapsulated but hard,&#8221; and &#8220;pattern&#8221; together.</p>
<p>There will probably be dark corners of any interesting application, but they should be placed there on purpose and successfully encapsulated from the rest of the app.  Why would they exist? Performance optimizations (the crazy SQL statements come to mind) or to make the rest of the app easier to develop (app specific frameworks).  If you do identify a need to get magical, you need to re-think it, then test the crap out of it.  Asking for a white paper on the topic wouldn&#8217;t hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt A</title>
		<link>http://myotherpants.com/2010/02/working-hard-or-hardly-working/comment-page-1/#comment-2374</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myotherpants.com/?p=200#comment-2374</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve actually got a few things going on in this post.  All good, IMO.

One thing I&#039;d add when it comes to the team, the generalists, and the lower bus number - it may pay to also consider actually reigning in your geniuses.  I didn&#039;t think I&#039;d ever find myself saying this because my old attitude was &quot;We hire smart, capable people who can learn, right?  Yes, it&#039;s a new technique - deal.&quot;  We don&#039;t compromise the quality of our solutions like this when learning is the core of our job expectation anyway.  Right?

But not everybody is created equal.  Which is to say talent-wise, sure, but also interest-wise and time-wise.  If you put a SQL genius on a project and let them free reign, you might have them submit some things that are elementary to them that your other people just can&#039;t grok.  And I don&#039;t even mean &quot;clever code&quot; in the traditional backhanded sense.  It could be smart and &quot;clear&quot;, as long as you have the 2 years daily professional use to get it.

If bus number is important, I&#039;d say you can&#039;t just rely on people to practice outside their comfort zone.  You also would want to consider working it the other way.  Something inside me is uncomfortable telling a genius they can&#039;t exercise their full talent and push the limit of their craft.  I&#039;m maybe more uncomfortable telling a smart but less-talented-IN-THIS-ONE-AREA team member they&#039;ve got to count cards as well as Rainman (an impossible standard).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve actually got a few things going on in this post.  All good, IMO.</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;d add when it comes to the team, the generalists, and the lower bus number &#8211; it may pay to also consider actually reigning in your geniuses.  I didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d ever find myself saying this because my old attitude was &#8220;We hire smart, capable people who can learn, right?  Yes, it&#8217;s a new technique &#8211; deal.&#8221;  We don&#8217;t compromise the quality of our solutions like this when learning is the core of our job expectation anyway.  Right?</p>
<p>But not everybody is created equal.  Which is to say talent-wise, sure, but also interest-wise and time-wise.  If you put a SQL genius on a project and let them free reign, you might have them submit some things that are elementary to them that your other people just can&#8217;t grok.  And I don&#8217;t even mean &#8220;clever code&#8221; in the traditional backhanded sense.  It could be smart and &#8220;clear&#8221;, as long as you have the 2 years daily professional use to get it.</p>
<p>If bus number is important, I&#8217;d say you can&#8217;t just rely on people to practice outside their comfort zone.  You also would want to consider working it the other way.  Something inside me is uncomfortable telling a genius they can&#8217;t exercise their full talent and push the limit of their craft.  I&#8217;m maybe more uncomfortable telling a smart but less-talented-IN-THIS-ONE-AREA team member they&#8217;ve got to count cards as well as Rainman (an impossible standard).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt A</title>
		<link>http://myotherpants.com/2010/02/working-hard-or-hardly-working/comment-page-1/#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myotherpants.com/?p=200#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>Please consider tweaking your stylesheet for more contrast between text &amp; background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please consider tweaking your stylesheet for more contrast between text &amp; background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

